Results 1 to 19 of 19
Hybrid View
-
13th August 2004 20:59 #1
ATHLON XP-2400+ BOX 266 MHZ Barton, 1.65V $82.0
a Leader , . ?
10!
-
13th August 2004 21:05 #2
AMD ATHLON 2400+ MP 266FSB SOCKET A THOROUGHBRED RETAIL BOX
,
2400+Last edited by bat_zerga; 13th August 2004 at 21:11.
- , !
- , .
, ., .
-
13th August 2004 21:18 #3
-
13th August 2004 21:29 #4
2200 '' - 512
overclockers.com
3400 2.00 axma2400fkt3c aiuhb dfi lp nf2 prometeia mkII
3240 2.25 IQHFA0402MPM ABIt NF7-S rev 2.0 nVentiv Mach II GT
3132 2.24 FQQXX Abit NF7-S rev 2.0 nVentiv Mach II GT
3076 2.20 IQZFA0348TPMW NF7, d10 tictac bios, 3.3Vdimm, I am Stang_Man Prometia Mach 1
3007 2.20 AXMH2400FQQ4C Abit NF7-S rev. 2 Mach II GT
2934 2.08 IQZFA0348TPMW NF7, d10 tictac bios, 3.3Vdimm, I am Stang_Man Prometia Mach 1, Arctic Silver 5
2871 1.98 IQYFA0346MPMW DFI Infinity A Mach I
2850 195. AQYHA 0413 VPKW NF7-S V2.0 VAPOCHILL PE
2808 193. AXMD2400FJQ4C AQYHA0 ABIT NF 7S v2,0 TDX CLONE WATER
2804 2.08 IQZFA0348TPMW NF7, d10 tictac bios, 3.3Vdimm, I am Stang_Man Thermalright SP-97,Panaflo92mm,0C Ambient CT Air- , !
- , .
, ., .
-
13th August 2004 21:55 #5
-
13th August 2004 21:59 #6
............
Last edited by 1115; 13th April 2007 at 23:25.
...-
-
13th August 2004 22:15 #7
-
13th August 2004 22:48 #8
................
Last edited by 1115; 13th April 2007 at 23:25.
...-
-
15th August 2004 18:47 #9
...
* Last Words: Modding... clocking?! Never!... This is bullshit! ... well... maybe only this time... just a little...
* , ... , .
-
15th August 2004 18:58 #10
- . . 2400+ . , . . - - .
-
15th August 2004 20:44 #11fake?Originally posted by 1115
.
.
ASUS TUF B450/Ryzen 5 3600X@4300 1.3v@NH-U12P/4x16GB DDR4-3200 Crucial Ballistix CL16/Palit RTX3060 Dual OC/SS 750W/Coolermaster case
-
15th August 2004 23:40 #12
,
` B3
(1- ) Athlon XP 2400+ ? 15133=2GHz 1,65V. .
ATHLON XP-2400+ BOX 266 MHZ Barton, 1.65V 36 $78.60 $79.60
:lol:: " , ."
-
16th August 2004 01:49 #13Originally posted by Flash
:lol:
.
ASUS TUF B450/Ryzen 5 3600X@4300 1.3v@NH-U12P/4x16GB DDR4-3200 Crucial Ballistix CL16/Palit RTX3060 Dual OC/SS 750W/Coolermaster case
-
16th August 2004 09:44 #14
[bg]bartyn takyw nema, ama mobilen bartyn takyw ima, ama spored cenata - sigurno si e toro qdro HR[/bg]
- , !
- , .
, ., .
-
16th August 2004 11:52 #15, 5.5*100(550) 5.5*66 (360) .-"May your glass be ever full.
May the roof over your head be always strong.
And may you be in heaven half an hour before the devil knows you're dead."
-
16th August 2004 14:02 #16
Join Date: Jul:2001
Location: ||
Posts: 404
Re:
, 1.65V ?Originally posted by MSAMAN
ATHLON XP-2400+ BOX 266 MHZ Barton, 1.65V $82.0
, ....WoW addicted!WoW is addicted to me!
-
16th August 2004 21:10 #17
..........
Last edited by 1115; 13th April 2007 at 23:25.
...-
-
17th August 2004 00:08 #18
, ... a ...
Last edited by Stefo; 17th August 2004 at 01:21.
-
17th August 2004 00:28 #19
@1115, , , ... - , , ...
...
...
, :
Copy/Paste / - ... , , /
...
... , ... :
As you can see, there are no external differences - the die is the same size on both CPUs and the layout is exactly the same. The differences between these two processors are all on the inside.
The first difference between the two chips is the multiplier. All current desktop Bartons have a locked multiplier, while all mobile Bartons have an unlocked multiplier. A fully unlocked multiplier is a great addition to have when overclocking; you can quite often reach the limit of another part of your system before your processor tops out, or vice versa, during your quest to reach your best "system" overclock. I refer to it as a system overclock, because raw CPU speed is not necessarily everything. It is important to strike a compromise between high front side bus (while remaining in sync with your memory bus to give good system bandwidth) and raw CPU speed to gain the maximum performance from the system as a whole. Athlon XPs on the whole are lacking in bandwidth due to their architecture, so any extra bandwidth you can give to your system will pay dividends when it comes to gaming and number crunching tasks.
Secondly we have a difference in the default system clock. The desktop Barton core runs at 166MHz FSB, where the mobile Barton runs at 133MHz FSB. The reasoning behind this is the fact that all Athlon-based laptop motherboards run at 133MHz FSB, and it would not make sense to release a 166MHz FSB mobile part for an architecture that is being phased out in favour of the K8 architecture.
Since the mobile Barton runs at a lower front side bus, it requires a boost in speed to give approximately the same performance as its desktop counterpart. The desktop Barton 2500+ runs at 1833MHz (11.0x166) while its mobile sibling runs at 1866MHz (14.0x133).
Finally, there is a difference in default core voltages. The desktop Barton runs at 1.65v, while the mobile Barton is rated to run at 1.45v. This can make quite a difference when it comes to overclocking as the mobile Barton is running at a higher external core clock, with lower voltage requirements. The silicon used in mobile Bartons is taken from the centre of the wafer, so they're made from better silicon, which should clock higher at the same core voltage.
, ...
, ...
/
SesikO, ...
Last edited by Stefo; 17th August 2004 at 07:46.




Reply With Quote
Lenovo ThinkPad 15 IdeaPad 15
5th May 2023, 22:16 in