Results 1 to 12 of 12
Thread: Microsoft vs. Linux. ?
Hybrid View
-
8th November 2004 10:26 #1. . - ( )
-
8th November 2004 12:12 #2
-
8th November 2004 13:16 #3
-
8th November 2004 13:29 #4Registered User
Join Date: Mar:2004
Location: In your dreams
Posts: 5,088
?



Apocalypse ...
-
8th November 2004 13:31 #5
-
8th November 2004 15:02 #6
, Claim:
:
CLAIM: Linux and OSS are just as vulnerable to security attacks and breaches as proprietary platforms.. . - ( )
-
8th November 2004 17:54 #7
-
8th November 2004 19:20 #8
-
8th November 2004 19:32 #9
http://www.linux-bg.org/cgi-bin/y/in...&key=366637204
K 130 , TCP/IP, DNS, DHCP, HTTP, FTP, PPP, POP3, IpSec ... .. "" ???
. , $ ., .
, .
( )
-
9th November 2004 13:52 #10Darfur!
"I'd hate to risk seeing the good in people" - Victor Gooch, after his blood-tests show prohibited misanthropy enhancers.
-
9th November 2004 20:00 #11
(OSS vs. Closed source) " ":
Given a large enough beta-tester and co-developer base, almost every problem will be characterized quickly and the fix obvious to someone.
Or, less formally, ``Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow.'' I dub this: ``Linus's Law''.
My original formulation was that every problem ``will be transparent to somebody''. Linus demurred that the person who understands and fixes the problem is not necessarily or even usually the person who first characterizes it. ``Somebody finds the problem,'' he says, ``and somebody else understands it. And I'll go on record as saying that finding it is the bigger challenge.'' That correction is important; we'll see how in the next section, when we examine the practice of debugging in more detail. But the key point is that both parts of the process (finding and fixing) tend to happen rapidly.
-
9th November 2004 21:48 #121Originally posted by SongBird
...
don't be a prick, hot chick, be a dick




Reply With Quote

LOG
6th May 2023, 12:03 in