Results 1 to 25 of 28
Thread: 6600GT X800?
Hybrid View
-
17th August 2005 01:06 #1
6600GT X800?
Asus N6600GT 128 Mb AGP Asus EAX800 256mb AGP Asus EAX800XL 256Mb AG, 19" LCD ??? Asus Sapphire, ?
!
!Benq 21.5" E2200HDA P223W: MSI K8 Neo4-F: Athlon 64 3200+ S939: 4X1GB DDR400 Super T: Sapphire HD3870 512MB DDR4: 3x250GB Maxtor SATA 16Cashe: LG-4163B: Sirtec 360W Dual Fan - !!!
-
18th August 2005 00:08 #2
-
18th August 2005 08:08 #3
. 800 320 3 - . . 7800 900/ / .6600
Lenovo Z50-70 | i5-4210U |2x4GB 1600Mhz | nVidia 840M | 15.6" FHD
Acer VN7-592G | i7-6700HQ | 2x4GB LDDR4 | nVidia GeForce GTX960M 4GB DDR5 | 128GB SSD | 15.6" IPS FHD
-
18th August 2005 09:20 #4
' 6600GT... - ... - .
X800, ( ) - - - (, " "), , -, ... X800XL, . "" , "", .. , ( ) ..* Last Words: Modding... clocking?! Never!... This is bullshit! ... well... maybe only this time... just a little...
* , ... , .
-
18th August 2005 11:06 #5
/ 800 XL . , - , 20-25% . Mitku ""
In terms of the two X800 XL cards weve looked at today, the Asus card is clearly the better of the two, but also costs in the range of 20-25% more. The Asus card has a much more efficient, lower noise cooling system, has dual DVI outputs, VIVO support, and can overclock a little better (on the core level), just to name some of the major advantages. At stock speeds though, the Asus X800 XL card did perform a bit slower compared to the Sapphire card (typically 2-4% slower). The Asus card is a better overall platform card, but if youre looking for performance and low costIf life gives you a computer...OVERCLOCK IT!
-
18th August 2005 12:10 #6
, .
:
SAPPHIRE X800 /256M/VIVO 260.0 270.0 279.0 USD
SAPPHIRE X800 PRO/256M/TVO/DVI 365.0 379.0 392.0 USD
GB RADEON X800 PRO/256M DDRIII 383.0 398.0 412.0 USD
... , 800
- 800 100$ - . ???
Benq 21.5" E2200HDA P223W: MSI K8 Neo4-F: Athlon 64 3200+ S939: 4X1GB DDR400 Super T: Sapphire HD3870 512MB DDR4: 3x250GB Maxtor SATA 16Cashe: LG-4163B: Sirtec 360W Dual Fan - !!!




Reply With Quote
, ...
5th May 2023, 14:20 in